Current:Home > ContactWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -Thrive Financial Network
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-18 11:52:36
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (2582)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Atlantic Coast Conference asks court to pause or dismiss Florida State’s lawsuit against league
- Prince Harry, Duchess Meghan hit the slopes in Canada to scope out new Invictus Games site: See photos
- Top National Security Council cybersecurity official on institutions vulnerable to ransomware attacks — The Takeout
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Auto workers threaten to strike again at Ford’s huge Kentucky truck plant in local contract dispute
- Connecticut-Marquette showdown in Big East highlights major weekend in men's college basketball
- Elkhorn man charged in Wisconsin sports bar killings
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- New York appeals court hears arguments over the fate of the state’s ethics panel
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- WTO chief insists trade body remains relevant as tariff-wielding Trump makes a run at White House
- California student charged with attempted murder in suspected plan to carry out high school shooting
- Pregnant Giannina Gibelli and Bachelor Nation's Blake Horstmann Reveal Sex of Baby
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Hyundai recalls more than 90,000 Genesis vehicles due to fire risk
- Man convicted in 2022 shooting of Indianapolis police officer that wounded officer in the throat
- Body believed to be missing 5-year-old Darnell Taylor found in sewer, Ohio police say
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Survivors of recent mass shootings revive calls for federal assault weapons ban, 20 years later
Pennsylvania magistrate judge is charged with shooting her ex-boyfriend in the head as he slept
About that AMC Networks class action lawsuit settlement email. Here's what it means to you
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Bow Wow Details Hospitalization & “Worst S--t He Went Through Amid Cough Syrup Addiction
Why Love Is Blind Is Like Marriage Therapy For Vanessa Lachey and Nick Lachey
She fell for a romance scam on Facebook. The man whose photo was used says it's happened before.