Current:Home > MyJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -Thrive Financial Network
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:17:47
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (37158)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Prosecutors say man accidentally recorded himself plotting wife's kidnapping
- Read Emma Heming Willis’ Father’s Day Message for “Greatest Dad” Bruce Willis
- Too Much Sun Degrades Coatings That Keep Pipes From Corroding, Risking Leaks, Spills and Explosions
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Kelly Osbourne Slams F--king T--t Prince Harry
- A big bank's big mistake, explained
- Kaley Cuoco's Ex-Husband Karl Cook Engaged Nearly 2 Years After Their Breakup
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Miss a credit card payment? Federal regulators want to put new limits on late fees
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- How the pandemic changed the rules of personal finance
- The story of Monopoly and American capitalism
- How Shanna Moakler Reacted After Learning Ex Travis Barker Is Expecting Baby With Kourtney Kardashian
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- A Plea to Make Widespread Environmental Damage an International Crime Takes Center Stage at The Hague
- Oil refineries release lots of water pollution near communities of color, data show
- Southwest faces investigation over holiday travel disaster as it posts a $220M loss
Recommendation
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Six Takeaways About Tropical Cyclones and Hurricanes From The New IPCC Report
Find 15 Gifts for the Reader in Your Life in This Book Lover Starter Pack
Kourtney Kardashian Has a Rockin' Family Night Out at Travis Barker's Concert After Pregnancy Reveal
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Why higher winter temperatures are affecting the logging industry
Warming Trends: Outdoor Heaters, More Drownings In Warmer Winters and Where to Put Leftover Turkey
Indicators of the Week: tips, eggs and whisky