Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Thrive Financial Network
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-14 23:32:49
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (869)
Related
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Jobs report: Unemployment rise may mean recession, rule says, but likely not this time
- D23 Ultimate Disney Fan Event Unveils Star Wars, Marvel & More Collections: An Exclusive First Look
- Los Angeles Chargers QB Justin Herbert to miss most of training camp with plantar fascia
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Ground cinnamon products added to FDA health alert, now 16 with elevated levels of lead
- CD match, raise, or 9% APY! Promos heat up before Fed rate cut. Hurry to get the best rate
- IOC: Female boxers were victims of arbitrary decision by International Boxing Association
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Kaylee McKeown sweeps backstroke gold; Regan Smith takes silver
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Harris has secured enough Democratic delegate votes to be the party’s nominee, committee chair says
- Only one thing has slowed golf's Xander Schauffele at Paris Olympics: Ants
- General Hospital's Cameron Mathison Steps Out With Aubree Knight Hours After Announcing Divorce
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Olympic golf desperately needs a team format. Here's a proposal.
- Who is Yusuf Dikec, Turkish pistol shooter whose hitman-like photo went viral?
- Thousands were arrested at college protests. For students, the fallout was only beginning
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
U.S. employers likely added 175,000 jobs in July as labor market cools gradually
Meet the painter with the best seat at one of Paris Olympics most iconic venues
Judge overturns $4.7 billion jury award to NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Harris has secured enough Democratic delegate votes to be the party’s nominee, committee chair says
Two women drowned while floating on a South Dakota lake as a storm blew in
Golfer Tommy Fleetwood plays at Olympics with heavy heart after tragedy in hometown