Current:Home > MyBanks’ Vows to Restrict Loans for Arctic Oil and Gas Development May Be Largely Symbolic -Thrive Financial Network
Banks’ Vows to Restrict Loans for Arctic Oil and Gas Development May Be Largely Symbolic
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 06:12:29
Over the last several months, some of the nation’s biggest banks announced they will not finance new oil and gas development in the Arctic. The new policies are the first steps by American banks to restrict lending to the oil industry, and they come after years of campaigning by environmental groups.
But a close look reveals that the policies may not amount to much at all. That’s because they generally limit only direct funding for Arctic operations, while banks rarely, if ever, provide such loans.
In fact, amid trillions of dollars in energy industry financing that advocacy groups have tracked over the last few years, not a single loan represented the type of deal that would be prohibited under the new policies.
“It’s safe to say that project financing in particular for extraction in the Arctic is very rare,” said Alison Kirsch, a researcher with Rainforest Action Network, which publishes an annual report tracking fossil fuel financing.
What’s more, drilling in the Arctic remains one of the more expensive propositions within a global oil and gas industry that has no shortage of other opportunities for growth. Even before oil prices tanked as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, oil companies were facing huge debts to banks that they’d used to fuel the fracking boom. Now, with the industry cutting spending by tens of billions of dollars as oil demand has plummeted, financial institutions may not be eager to support Arctic development for purely business reasons, leaving aside environmental concerns.
Still, advocates argue that the loan restrictions represent an important step in a campaign to end drilling in the Arctic. Ben Cushing, with the Sierra Club’s Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, said the restrictions could make it harder for some smaller oil and gas companies operating in Alaska to secure loans. And beyond any direct impact, he said, the announcements carry symbolic value that could shape public opinion and policy.
“Having some of the world’s largest banks, having huge names on Wall Street, banks people recognize, sending a signal about what they do and don’t want to finance I think sends a really important signal to the public and to politicians,” Cushing said.
On Monday, Politico reported that Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) and a group of Republican senators were planning to send a letter to banks condemning the restrictions.
A spokesman for Sullivan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A Campaign Builds Momentum
The new bank policies—announced most recently by Citigroup and Morgan Stanley—are the culmination of years of campaigning by environmentalists and indigenous groups that began after Congress opened a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling in 2017.
“It was clear that the years- and decades-long playbook to protect the refuge was going to need to be updated,” Cushing said, “and we were going to need to focus on other targets” beyond politicians.
Together with the Gwich’in Steering Committee, which represents indigenous people who live near the refuge, the Sierra Club and other groups began talking to the banks about their concerns. They worked with pension funds, responsible investment firms and other institutional investors to build support. They attended the banks’ shareholder meetings and launched public campaigns to pressure the lenders from the outside, too.
“It’s important to recognize what this fight has meant to the Gwich’in people and the Gwich’in Steering Committee, for whom this is really a fight for their way of life,” Cushing said. The Gwich’in have for thousands of years subsisted off the caribou herd that migrates through the refuge. “It’s gratifying to see some of the largest banks in the world listening to them.”
The Gwich’in Steering Committee did not respond to calls and emails requesting comment.
A Quiet Turnaround in the Alaskan Arctic
European and Australian banks were among the first to adopt policies restricting lending, with Goldman Sachs the first American bank to announce one in December. According to Rainforest Action Network, at least 20 banks have now implemented some form of restrictions, six of which include broader corporate-wide limitations for companies operating in the Arctic.
For the banks, it may have been an easy sell.
Oil prices had stagnated after crashing in 2014, and fracking was surging in Texas, North Dakota and other states, leaving the Arctic as a side story for much of the industry. Even before the campaign, one Goldman Sachs analyst told CNBC in 2017, “We think there is almost no rationale for Arctic exploration,” noting the abundance of other, cheaper options for growth, such as U.S. shale fields.
Citigroup said in its announcement last month that it had never provided the type of project-specific financing it would now prohibit, and Wells Fargo said in its policy that it had actually halted such lending two years earlier as “part of a larger 2018 risk-based decision.”
Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s push for drilling in the Arctic refuge has stalled.
Still, apart from the controversy over the refuge, there has been a quiet turnaround in Alaska’s Arctic.
“It’s somewhat under the radar, but there’s a little bit of a boom happening in Alaska these days in the Arctic,” said Nikos Tsafos, a senior fellow at Center for Strategic and International Studies.
A series of recent discoveries outside of the controversial Arctic national refuge have ended a decades-long decline in Alaska’s oil production, to the point that the state now forecasts output will hold steady for years. It’s there, Tsafos said, that the restrictions on lending would have any impact.
The policies are unlikely to cause difficulty for a company as large as ConocoPhillips, one of the top operators in the Arctic, which can fund its drilling with cash while drawing loans for general operations. But Tsafos said it’s possible that banks could rule out lending to smaller firms that have a majority of their operations in Alaska.
While the lending restrictions certainly won’t help the state’s efforts to boost drilling, he said, it’s impossible to say what impact they might have. “It’s another thing I add on the negative scale, but it’s hard to say how negative it will be,” Tsafos said.
Reid Porter, a spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute, said in an email that Alaska represents one of the largest opportunities for new oil and gas development in the country, and he pointed to comments from Alaska’s Congressional delegation criticizing attempts to limit financing.
Cushing acknowledged that the policies may have only a limited effect on the pace of drilling in Alaska, but he said they’re an important step in a longer campaign. He pointed to policies that some of the same banks have adopted on coal, which include broader limits on financing.
“These things happen step by step. And up until now, for most of the banks, the only type of exclusion of any kind they had, even for project financing, was just for the coal sector,” Cushing said. “This is a big first step in that direction, and so these banks drawing that big red line on the oil and gas industry I think signals that this is going to be the direction of travel for them.”
veryGood! (19231)
Related
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Colorado GOP chair ousted in a contentious vote that he dismisses as a ‘sham’
- Judge orders Martin Shkreli to turn over all copies of unreleased Wu-Tang Clan album
- Presidential transition planning has begun in earnest, but Trump and Harris are already behind
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli ordered to hand over copies of Wu-Tang Clan's unreleased album
- When does 2024 NFL regular season begin? What to know about opening week.
- Connor Stalions Netflix documentary: Release date, how to watch 'Sign Stealer'
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Democrats sue to block Georgia rules that they warn will block finalization of election results
Ranking
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Spider-Man's Marisa Tomei Shares Sweet Part of Zendaya and Tom Holland Romance
- Princess Kate seen in rare outing for church service in Scotland
- LA to pay more than $38M for failing to make affordable housing accessible
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Former North Dakota federal prosecutor who handled Peltier, Medina shootout cases dies
- 'Only Murders in the Building' Season 4: Release date, time, cast, where to watch mystery comedy
- These Beetlejuice Gifts & Merch Are So Spook-Tacularly Cute, You’ll Be Saying His Name Three Times
Recommendation
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Lily Allen Responds to Backlash After Giving Up Puppy for Eating Her Passport
A judge pauses key Biden immigration program. Immigrant families struggle to figure out what to do.
'Give him a push': Watch beachgoers help stranded shark back into the water in Nantucket
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Khloe Kardashian Admits She's Having a Really Hard Time as Daughter True Thompson Starts First Grade
Judge says 4 independent and third-party candidates should be kept off Georgia presidential ballots
Erika Jayne's Ex Tom Girardi Found Guilty on 4 Counts of Wire Fraud