Current:Home > NewsKim Kardashian Alludes to Tense Family Feud in Tearful Kardashians Teaser -Thrive Financial Network
Kim Kardashian Alludes to Tense Family Feud in Tearful Kardashians Teaser
View
Date:2025-04-17 04:09:20
Kim Kardashian and Kourtney Kardashian are gearing up for another round of family feud—but this is no game.
ICYMI, the season three trailer for The Kardashians hinted at growing tension between the two sisters after Kourtney accused Kim of using her wedding to Travis Barker as a business move. And a May 15 teaser for the Hulu series further alluded to the siblings' spat, with Kim declaring in a voiceover, "I don't want to fight with family, bottom line."
Meanwhile, sister Kourtney is heard emphasizing, "There's no boundaries, there's no respect."
And if you're wondering how their siblings feel, it's clear that everyone is determined to come a resolution, with Kylie Jenner noting, "I don't think anyone's in the wrong. I see both sides." As for Kendall Jenner, she also shared a neutral stance, as she's heard saying, "As sisters, we have to uplift each other."
However, it's Khloe Kardashian who seems to outline the problem plain and simple: "The tension is brewing. How did we get here?"
As for how we got here to the head-turning teaser, allow us to rewind a bit. In the season three trailer released on April 27, Kourtney accused Kim—who was seen sporting a few Dolce & Gabbana looks in Italy and would later become the face of the brand—of using her wedding weekend as a "business opportunity."
But her commentary didn't stop there since Kourtney also made it known there was no room for error or confusion. "People think it's a misunderstanding," she says in the trailer, adding, "But it's not."
As Kourtney seemingly added of Kim, "It's who she is to her core."
Viewers will get to see their situation unravel firsthand when season 3 of The Kardashians premieres on Hulu May 25.
veryGood! (433)
Related
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Biden’s Morehouse graduation invitation is sparking backlash, complicating election-year appearance
- Tyler, the Creator, The Killers to headline Outside Lands 2024: Tickets, dates, more
- 'Them: The Scare': Release date, where to watch new episodes of horror anthology series
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- West Virginia says it will appeal ruling that allowed transgender teen athlete to compete
- Kate Middleton Just Got a New Royal Title From King Charles III
- Ancestry website to catalogue names of Japanese Americans incarcerated during World War II
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Secret army of women who broke Nazi codes get belated recognition for WWII work
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Tyler, the Creator, The Killers to headline Outside Lands 2024: Tickets, dates, more
- Mega Millions winning numbers for April 23 drawing: Did anyone win $202 million jackpot?
- Christina Applegate Suffering From Gross Sapovirus Symptoms After Unknowingly Ingesting Poop
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Jennifer Garner, Mark Ruffalo and Judy Greer reunite as '13 Going on 30' turns 20
- Michigan student dies 'suddenly' on school trip to robotics competition in Texas
- Biden administration is announcing plans for up to 12 lease sales for offshore wind energy
Recommendation
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Supreme Court to weigh Trump immunity claim over 2020 election prosecution. Here are the details.
Student-pilot, instructor were practicing emergency procedures before fatal crash: NTSB
Prosecutors argue Trump willfully and flagrantly violated gag order, seek penalty
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
What is the Meta AI tool? Can you turn it off? New feature rolls out on Facebook, Instagram
Ex-officer wanted for 2 murders found dead in standoff, child found safe after Amber Alert
When can doctors provide emergency abortions in states with strict bans? Supreme Court to weigh in